You realize, of course, that if you take the genealogies in Genesis
as factual, uninterrupted tallies of lifespans, in order to make
arguments about who was still alive when so and so was also alive, that
you wind up with a 6000-year-old world, right?
Now, ask
yourself, "Is that something I think I have reasonable grounds for
doing, in order to bolster an interpretative theory first proposed by
people with no sense of the age of the earth?"
No comments:
Post a Comment